American companies are stuck in a crisis of broken talent filters. We keep screening for the same stale credentials—elite schools, FAANG logos, “prestigious” employers. It’s a modern form of credentialist bureaucracy that has crept into every institution. And like in government, this checkbox mentality is making our companies slower, safer, and less competitive.
The problem is twofold. First, old proxies poorly predict real capability. A self-taught engineer who’s shipped multiple products often outperforms someone who maintained legacy code at a big tech firm. An electrician-turned-entrepreneur who built a thriving business has sharper instincts than an MBA who’s only studied them.
Second, we have no systematic way to discover and assess exceptional people who don’t fit the mold. America is full of them, but finding them depends on chance and networks. Too many great people never get a fair shot to show what they can do. For too long, companies have been checking credential boxes and signaling virtue instead of building the meritocratic infrastructure to discover and empower the best talent.
We’re facilitating objective testing to measure what truly matters—critical thinking, problem solving, adaptability, execution—designed to be accessible and to strip away proxies for privilege. Credentials and experience still matter—but as part of a holistic evaluation, not as gatekeeping filters.
This matters far beyond tech. America’s strength has always come from empowering exceptional talent, regardless of background. The Manhattan Project didn’t succeed by checking credentials—it succeeded by finding the most capable people and letting them work.
America’s next frontier is unlocking hidden talent. Meritocracy is how we get there.
-Joe Lonsdale, Sam Lessin, and Zack Ganieany
Rating Reviews
Rating is calculated based on
4
reviews and is evolving.
Pros: The team environment is a major plus; people are generally supportive and collaborative. There are good opportunities to learn new skills and take on challenging projects, especially within the financial technology sector. The hybrid work setup offers a good balance, allowing for remote work days while maintaining in-office connection.
Cons: At times, project scopes and priorities can shift quite rapidly without clear communication, leading to some frustration. Some internal processes feel a bit outdated and could be streamlined for better efficiency. Leadership can sometimes feel distant, making it hard to get a clear picture of long-term strategy.
Advice to Management: Consider enhancing cross-departmental communication regarding project changes and long-term strategic objectives to ensure alignment and reduce ambiguity.
Show more
Pros: The collaborative spirit at MeritFirst is fantastic. As an AI Engineer, I've had incredible opportunities to dive into cutting-edge machine learning and artificial intelligence projects. My colleagues are brilliant and always willing to share knowledge, fostering an environment perfect for continuous learning and skill development within the competitive tech sector. We get to work on impactful solutions, and the flat hierarchy means your ideas are heard, which is highly motivating. The work
Cons: While I'm generally happy, the job security aspect could be a bit clearer. Being in a rapidly evolving industry, it sometimes feels like long-term roles aren't as explicitly defined as in more established companies, which can create minor uncertainty for an AI Engineer planning their career trajectory. Additionally, some internal approval processes for new initiatives or resource allocation can occasionally slow down progress on innovative projects. Streamlining these could further empower
Advice to Management: Consider providing more transparent communication regarding long-term career paths and job security within the AI engineering department. Also, look into optimizing internal approval workflows to enhance agility and responsiveness, especially for new technology adoption and project execution.
Show more
Pros: I really enjoyed the team environment at MeritFirst; people were genuinely collaborative and helpful, making daily work enjoyable. The company culture fostered a sense of community, and working a hybrid schedule out of the Austin, TX office provided a good balance between remote work and in-person interaction. The projects were interesting and relevant to the fintech sector, offering opportunities to learn new technologies.
Cons: While collaboration was great, opportunities for rapid career advancement weren't as clear as I'd hoped. Sometimes, leadership communications felt a bit out of sync with what was happening on the ground, leading to minor confusion. The benefits package was decent but could be more competitive with other tech companies in the Austin area.
Advice to Management: Consider more proactive communication regarding strategic direction and clearer pathways for employee advancement. Enhancing the benefits package could also boost morale.
Show more
What's the career progression like for a CEO at a growing fintech company like MeritFirst?
As CEO at MeritFirst, I've seen significant opportunities for strategic leadership within our rapidly expanding fintech operations in San Francisco. The company size allows for direct impact on our mission to transform financial services.
What is the general working culture like at MeritFirst for software engineers?
The working culture at MeritFirst is collaborative and focuses on continuous improvement, especially within the software engineering teams. There's a strong emphasis on knowledge sharing and supporting junior developers as they grow their careers here.
What is the typical working culture like at MeritFirst for entry-level tech roles in their London office?
The working culture at MeritFirst is collaborative and fast-paced, especially within the engineering teams. New hires in London often find a supportive environment where mentorship is readily available for junior developers.
US
