Rating distribution:
0 reviews rated 5 out of 5 stars.
0 reviews rated 4 out of 5 stars.
2 reviews rated 3 out of 5 stars.
0 reviews rated 2 out of 5 stars.
0 reviews rated 1 out of 5 stars.
5
4
3
2
1
Detail Ratings
Work life balance
4.0
Career Growth
3.0
Work flexibility
4.0
Job Security
4.0
Pay and benefits
4.0
Leadership
4.0
Company Culture
4.0
Disclaimer: Reviews on Jobstore are independently submitted by users; we do not guarantee the accuracy
or truth of any individual submission.
To ensure a clear and accessible reading experience, Jobstore utilizes AI assistance to correct
typos and minor grammatical errors in user reviews. The original reviewer intent, star rating, and
sentiment are strictly preserved.
Read more
Pros: The R&D department is quite innovative, and there's a strong sense of camaraderie among colleagues, especially within the Quality Assurance and Production teams. Benefits are standard for the industry in Brazil, and the location near Belo Horizonte is convenient for commuting. It's a good place to gain experience in a regulated manufacturing environment.
Cons: Bureaucracy can slow things down significantly, and sometimes communication between departments isn't as smooth as it could be. Career advancement feels a bit tied to tenure rather than pure merit for some positions. Management could be more proactive in addressing process inefficiencies.
Advice to Management: Consider streamlining inter-departmental communication and implementing clearer pathways for performance-based promotions to boost morale and efficiency.
Show more
Pros: The company really tries to promote a healthy work-life balance, which is a huge plus in the demanding pharmaceutical research sector. I've found that hours are generally manageable, and the leadership respects personal time. There's a strong sense of camaraderie among the R&D teams, making collaborative projects enjoyable. It's a good environment for learning and developing skills in drug discovery.
Cons: While work-life balance is good, sometimes during critical project phases, the workload can become intense, leading to longer hours unexpectedly. Also, career progression paths could be more clearly defined; it's not always obvious how to move up within the research departments, and approval processes for new initiatives can sometimes feel a bit slow, which can impact the pace of innovation.
Advice to Management: Consider creating more transparent career progression frameworks for scientific roles and streamlining approval processes for R&D projects to foster quicker innovation cycles.
Show more
US
