Rating distribution:
0 reviews rated 5 out of 5 stars.
1 reviews rated 4 out of 5 stars.
6 reviews rated 3 out of 5 stars.
0 reviews rated 2 out of 5 stars.
0 reviews rated 1 out of 5 stars.
5
4
3
2
1
Detail Ratings
Work life balance
4.0
Career Growth
3.0
Work flexibility
4.0
Job Security
4.0
Pay and benefits
3.0
Leadership
3.0
Company Culture
4.0
Disclaimer: Reviews on Jobstore are independently submitted by users; we do not guarantee the accuracy
or truth of any individual submission.
To ensure a clear and accessible reading experience, Jobstore utilizes AI assistance to correct
typos and minor grammatical errors in user reviews. The original reviewer intent, star rating, and
sentiment are strictly preserved.
Read more
Pros: The projects at TestCrew are genuinely interesting and provide good exposure to various testing methodologies in the software testing industry. I appreciate the flexibility that comes with the remote work arrangement, which really helps with work-life balance. The team I've worked with has been supportive and knowledgeable, making problem-solving sessions productive and collaborative.
Cons: Sometimes, communication pathways between different teams or departments can be a bit unclear, leading to minor delays or confusion. The career progression framework could also be more clearly defined, making it easier to understand advancement opportunities beyond the current role. It feels like a company with great potential that could benefit from more streamlined internal processes.
Advice to Management: Consider refining inter-departmental communication channels and formalizing career pathing. Investing in clearer project roadmaps and skill development opportunities would greatly benefit employees and the company's growth in the quality engineering space.
Show more
Pros: The flexibility of remote work is excellent, making it easy to manage personal life alongside professional responsibilities. I appreciate the variety of software testing projects I've been involved in, which keeps the work engaging. The team culture is collaborative, and colleagues are generally helpful and skilled in their quality engineering roles. It's a decent place for anyone looking to grow their testing expertise.
Cons: While processes are in place, sometimes project requirements or timelines can feel a bit fluid, leading to occasional crunch times. Communication between departments could be smoother to avoid misunderstandings. There's also a feeling that opportunities for formal career advancement could be more clearly defined within the quality assurance track.
Advice to Management: Consider standardizing project onboarding and communication workflows to enhance efficiency. More defined paths for career progression within quality engineering roles would also be beneficial for employee retention and motivation.
Show more
Pros: The best part about TestCrew was definitely the flexibility. Being fully remote made managing personal life alongside work straightforward. I appreciated the exposure to different software testing methodologies and tools. The team was generally collaborative and willing to help out when needed. It's a good starting point for anyone looking to build a career in quality engineering.
Cons: While there were opportunities to learn, the consistency of challenging projects varied significantly. Some periods felt a bit too slow, with not enough demanding work, which could impact engagement. Also, career advancement isn't always clearly defined, sometimes feeling like you're treading water if not actively pushing for new roles. Pay was average for the industry.
Advice to Management: Consider standardizing project assignments to ensure more consistent workload and engagement for all QA testers. Clearer pathways for skill development and promotion would also be beneficial.
Show more
Pros: I've appreciated the hands-on experience in various software testing projects. The company encourages continuous learning in Quality Engineering, which is great for skill development. It's a place where you can really hone your testing abilities and contribute to product quality.
Cons: Sometimes, project management can feel a bit reactive rather than proactive, leading to occasional crunch times. Communication between teams could also be streamlined to improve overall efficiency.
Advice to Management: Focus on enhancing cross-departmental communication and implementing more robust long-term project planning to mitigate last-minute rushes and improve overall workflow.
Show more
Pros: The biggest win is the flexibility offered; remote work is genuinely supported, making it easy to manage personal life. The team is incredibly supportive, and there's a strong emphasis on continuous learning and skill development within software testing. Management is generally approachable and transparent about company goals.
Cons: While collaboration is high, some project management tools and workflows could be more standardized across teams. Occasionally, there's a feeling of being stretched thin on resources for certain critical testing phases, which can impact delivery timelines slightly. More structured onboarding for new hires could also be beneficial.
Advice to Management: Continue investing in employee development and streamline project management practices. Recognizing team contributions more formally would also be appreciated.
Show more
Pros: I like the remote setup; WFH flexibility is a major plus for anyone in software testing. You save a lot of commute time, which helps a bit with personal life. We get decent equipment to do our job effectively as a remote software quality engineer.
Cons: Sometimes, the workload for test automation engineers feels really heavy. Project deadlines can be tough, making 40-hour weeks turn into 50 quite often. It's hard to truly disconnect when you're a remote employee and the project pipeline is always full.
Advice to Management: Try to better manage the project scope for quality engineering teams. More realistic deadlines would help prevent burnout.
Show more
Pros: For a Software Quality Engineer, there's some decent remote work flexibility if your team fully supports it. I've seen some QA Engineer roles get more freedom. You can often adjust your start time a bit, which is nice.
Cons: Not all quality engineering teams truly embrace remote work. Some managers still push for more onsite time, even if you're officially remote. It can feel more like a hybrid model, impacting true work flexibility for some.
Advice to Management: Standardize the remote work policy across all quality engineering teams. Provide more consistent support for truly flexible work arrangements, especially for remote QA Engineer roles. This would really help with employee morale and reduce confusion.
Show more
SA
