Overall employee rating

3.7
Based on 95 reviews
Rating distribution: 0 reviews rated 5 out of 5 stars. 31 reviews rated 4 out of 5 stars. 64 reviews rated 3 out of 5 stars. 5 reviews rated 2 out of 5 stars. 0 reviews rated 1 out of 5 stars.
5
4
3
2
1
Detail Ratings
Work life balance
4.0
Career Growth
4.0
Work flexibility
4.0
Job Security
4.0
Pay and benefits
4.0
Leadership
4.0
Company Culture
4.0
Disclaimer: Reviews on Jobstore are independently submitted by users; we do not guarantee the accuracy or truth of any individual submission. Read more
Chemical Engineer
3.9
27 September 2026
Global chemical leader with solid stability, but pace can lag
Pros: Great job security and access to extensive R&D resources. The benefits are competitive, and the hybrid work model provides a good degree of work flexibility. Opportunities to collaborate with international teams and learn from experienced professionals in the chemical sector are definite highlights.
Cons: Decision-making processes can be slow due to the sheer size of the organization, occasionally impacting project timelines. Cross-departmental communication isn't always as smooth as it could be, which sometimes leads to inefficiencies.
Advice to Management: Consider streamlining decision-making processes and enhancing cross-functional team collaboration to foster innovation and agility within the R&D departments.
Show more
Process Engineer
3.9
26 September 2026
Solid Chemical Engineering Role with Bureaucratic Hurdles
Pros: BASF really invests in its employees, offering excellent technical training and opportunities for professional development within the chemical sector. The job security here is top-notch, which is a huge plus. I appreciated the global reach and the chance to work on large-scale projects, contributing to a vital industry. Collaboration with experienced colleagues was a highlight.
Cons: Navigating internal processes can be slow and bureaucratic, which sometimes impacts project timelines. While there's flexibility in schedules, formal approvals for significant changes can take time. The sheer size of the organization can make it hard to see the immediate impact of individual contributions.
Advice to Management: Focus on streamlining approval processes and empowering teams to make quicker decisions to enhance agility within this large chemical enterprise.
Show more
Chemical Engineer
3.6
25 September 2026
Good development, but bureaucratic hurdles slow progress
Pros: BASF provides a robust platform for learning and professional development, especially for those new to the chemical manufacturing sector. The colleagues are generally collaborative and experienced. There's a sense of stability that comes with a large, established global player. Work flexibility is decent, allowing for some hybrid arrangements that help manage personal commitments.
Cons: Decision-making processes can feel quite hierarchical and slow, which sometimes delays innovation or project execution. There's a lot of emphasis on established procedures, which can sometimes stifle agility. Finding clear, fast-tracked advancement can also be challenging without actively pushing for it.
Advice to Management: Focus on streamlining approval processes and empowering teams to make quicker decisions. This could significantly boost efficiency and employee engagement in a hybrid work setting.
Show more
Research Scientist
3.9
25 September 2026
Valuable Chemical Research Experience with Global Reach, But Bureaucracy is Real
Pros: Working at BASF in their chemical research facilities in Germany provided a stable and secure professional environment. The access to extensive resources and the opportunity to contribute to large-scale, innovative projects were significant highlights. The company's global presence offers exposure to diverse markets and technologies, which is fantastic for professional development in materials science and agrochemicals.
Cons: The primary drawback was the inherent bureaucracy common in such a large, multinational corporation. Decision-making processes could be lengthy, and implementing new ideas sometimes felt hindered by layers of approval. While flexibility exists, it often requires significant justification within established corporate structures, impacting the pace of agile development.
Advice to Management: Streamline inter-departmental communication and approval workflows to foster quicker innovation cycles and empower R&D teams to implement novel solutions more efficiently.
Show more
Chemical Engineer
3.7
24 September 2026
Stable Chemical Manufacturing Role, Some Bureaucratic Hurdles
Pros: BASF offers a strong foundation for professionals in the chemical industry. My role as a Chemical Engineer provided ample opportunities to work on diverse projects and learn new technologies. The company's global presence means there's a consistent approach to safety and quality, which is reassuring. The stability is a major plus, and colleagues are generally knowledgeable and helpful, fostering a collaborative atmosphere.
Cons: While the work itself is engaging, navigating internal processes can sometimes feel slow, especially for implementing new ideas or optimizing existing workflows. There's a degree of bureaucracy common in large, multinational corporations. Occasional communication gaps between departments can lead to minor delays in project execution. Flexibility in day-to-day tasks could be improved.
Advice to Management: Consider streamlining approval processes for innovation and operational improvements. Empowering teams with more autonomy in day-to-day task management could boost efficiency and morale.
Show more
Senior Process Engineer
4.0
23 September 2026
Stable chemical industry role with global impact
Pros: BASF offers great job security, which is a major plus, especially in the chemical manufacturing sector. The company invests heavily in innovation and sustainability initiatives, making the work feel meaningful. There are many opportunities for professional development and learning new technologies. The work-life balance is generally respected, allowing for a decent personal life alongside demanding projects, and the benefits package is competitive for the region.
Cons: While leadership is generally competent, there can be a noticeable amount of bureaucracy and slower decision-making processes, particularly when coordinating across different global or regional departments. Sometimes, strategic goals aren't clearly communicated down to the team level, leading to a bit of confusion on priorities. This can occasionally impact project timelines.
Advice to Management: Continue fostering innovation and sustainability. Consider streamlining cross-departmental communication for faster project execution and clearer strategic alignment.
Show more
Process Engineer
3.9
23 September 2026
Global Chemical Firm with Steady Learning, Bureaucracy is a Hurdle
Pros: BASF offers excellent opportunities to learn and grow within the chemical sector. The global scale means exposure to advanced processes and technologies. My colleagues were generally supportive, and there's a sense of stability working for such a large, reputable organization.
Cons: Decision-making processes can be quite slow, and there's a noticeable level of corporate bureaucracy that sometimes hinders agility. Implementing new ideas or improvements often involves navigating multiple layers of approval, which can be frustrating for front-line roles like mine.
Advice to Management: Streamline approval workflows for operational improvements to foster greater innovation and agility within the manufacturing teams. Empowering local decision-making could speed up progress.
Show more
Senior R&D Scientist
3.9
22 September 2026
Valuable R&D role with growth, but leadership communication could improve.
Pros: BASF offers a strong foundation for a career in research and development, particularly within the chemical sector. The global resources and collaborative spirit among colleagues in the Kuala Lumpur office are definite highlights. It's a place where you can contribute to meaningful projects and gain exposure to cutting-edge science, often with hybrid flexibility that aids work-life balance.
Cons: While the R&D team is generally supportive, top-level leadership communication can sometimes feel a bit out of sync with ground-level operations. There are occasional delays in decision-making, which can slow down project timelines. Pay and benefits, while competitive, might not always keep pace with the rapidly evolving market for specialized scientific talent.
Advice to Management: Enhance communication channels between senior leadership and R&D teams to ensure alignment on project goals and operational challenges. Consider more frequent, transparent updates.
Show more
Research Chemist
3.9
22 September 2026
Solid R&D role with good work-life balance, but bureaucracy can slow things down.
Pros: The work-life balance is generally excellent here, which is a major plus for maintaining personal well-being. As a Research Chemist, I appreciate the access to advanced lab equipment and the opportunity to contribute to meaningful projects in the chemical industry. The colleagues are knowledgeable and supportive, making the day-to-day collaborative and productive. My role involves polymer chemistry research.
Cons: While the core R&D is strong, dealing with inter-departmental approvals and supply chain logistics for raw materials can be quite slow. This often leads to delays in experimental phases. Communication between different global teams within BASF can also be challenging at times, requiring extra effort to align on project goals.
Advice to Management: Streamline cross-functional approval processes and improve communication channels between global R&D and local manufacturing/logistics to enhance project efficiency and reduce lead times.
Show more
Senior Process Engineer
3.9
21 September 2026
Solid engineering challenges, strong team, but management needs to speed up.
Pros: The technical challenges were consistently engaging, dealing with complex chemical processes. I had the chance to work with highly skilled and dedicated colleagues, making day-to-day collaboration rewarding. Being part of a reputable global player like BASF also lent a sense of stability and prestige to the role.
Cons: Decision-making processes can feel quite slow and bureaucratic, often requiring multiple layers of approval. Sometimes, communication between departments could be clearer, leading to minor delays or misunderstandings on project execution. The pace sometimes felt a bit stifled by internal procedures.
Advice to Management: Consider streamlining approval workflows and fostering more direct cross-departmental communication to enhance project agility and responsiveness. Empowering teams with faster decision-making authority would be beneficial.
Show more

See More Companies

Are you sure?

Once you confirm, please note that this action cannot be undone.